play logo
Switch to:  zoorag  ·  newsrag
Games, technology, and related geeky goodness
Submit an article to the Playrag community:
Offline
helava
Lifetime Interest Score:
86% 
Duke Nukem Developer 3D Realms Shuts Down (Updated)
0 pops!
890 views
Submitted 3 years ago
helava says,
Hrm. If this is true, and 3D Realms has shut down, it's the end of an era. It's also the end of a very, very long running joke. While I feel back for everyone who's out of a job, 12 years to release a game is well beyond stupid - it's incompetent.

Whoever was running the show behind DNF (totally appropriate, if it's not finished) should have been fired 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 years into the process, at the very least. The game's long past lost its relevance, the character always was a derivative ripoff, but at least the game had a neat amount of interactivity. It's long since fallen way behind the curve, and without that, there's really nothing interesting about it at all.

Again, I really feel for anyone who's lost their job, but the project needed, desperately, to be killed.
4 people found this interesting. Did you?
Yes  ·  No
Article excerpt from shacknews.com — "Update: Apogee Software and Deep Silver have issued a statement to Shacknews, confirming that there is a "situation at 3D Realms" but stressing they are not affected. "Deep Silver and Apogee Software are not affected by the situation at 3D Realms," a representative for the companies told us. "Development on the Duke Nukem Trilogy is...

Read the full article at shacknews.com »
meh
user photo Offline
Posted 3 years ago
Still, you can't help but feel sorry for those fans who quietly whispered to their collective circle, "Don't worry guys, just a couple more years..."

Now their dreams are SHATTERED.
 
12 people found this interesting. Did you?
Yes  ·  No
Posted 3 years ago
According to Take-Two their dreams may not yet be shattered. Take-Two said they could hand the development off to someone else. Of course we all know how that story goes. Just 2 more years...
 
4 people found this interesting. Did you?
Yes  ·  No
Posted 3 years ago
I'm still confounded as to why it would, under any circumstances, take 12 years to develop a freakin' Duke Nukem sequel.

1. Guns
2. Tits
3. Aliens
4. Smarmy one-liners

That's it... that doesn't take 12 years.
 
4 people found this interesting. Did you?
Yes  ·  No
Posted 3 years ago
My best rationalization for them, is that the development cycle is slower than the progress of technology. They have said that they wanted to play the best game they possibly could. So perhaps when they started developing in DirectX 4, then saw the neat things DX 5 could so, so put out the schedule, and converted to DX 5, then saw the neat things some new framework could do... etc, etc.

That's just speculation, and I'm not saying that even if it is the case, its a good idea, but that's my best thought as to why it took 12 years.
 
4 people found this interesting. Did you?
Yes  ·  No
Posted 3 years ago
I've heard from people who at one point or another worked at 3D Realms that basically that's exactly what happened. They'd fall behind the curve, and then have to port everything to the next new thing.

But the thing is, fundamentally, the only game that's really "changed the game" for FPS's in the last 13 years is Half Life, because of the way it told its story in a relentlessly first-person fashion.

But with Duke, that's not the case - explicitly not the case, or Duke himself wouldn't be much of a character. So, a HUGE amount of the work can be done up front - you can script the whole game, design the general layout and look of the levels, and there's no way that technology can keep outpacing you over the years.

Not if you're competent at your job. I mean, a designer has to be part futurist - you have to be able to anticipate those changes in technology, or the upcoming trends. If you can't, then you get caught flat-footed. And I can understand it happening once - particularly when Duke Forever was supposed to be coming out, you had Quake, Q2, Q3, Unreal all in the span of a very short time. So "keeping up with the Joneses" was probably a huge pain.

But to have it happen for 13 straight years, and for the last three years or so with a clearly dominant toolset/engine (UE3), to have not gotten DNF out shows a tremendous failure of planning on the part of the company. Like I've said in other posts - I'm sure some of the artists, programmers, designers, etc. were great, and worth hiring, but I'd never hire someone who managed their project schedule - not in a million zillion years.
 
2 people found this interesting. Did you?
Yes  ·  No
Add your comment:
Anonymous
user photo
Please log in or register to add your own comment.
About helava
S H
Oakland, CA
36, Male
Joined: January 24, 2008
Level: Level 9
Points: 163,920
Lifetime Interest: 3246, 86%
Today's Interest: 0, 0%
Following: 18
Followers: 23
top tags
'full_article.php' rendered in 1.0912 seconds on machine '121'.
Please login or register to comment, submit articles, and gain followers!